Archive for January, 2013
Gun control articles are written with a view to bring the issue of gun control into public focus. One who writes a gun control essay need not be an expert. Anyone can find an abundance of gun crime statistics at various places. You can find them in the current editions of periodicals as well as in the archives. You can also find them in various websites that are dedicated to presenting gun control facts.
In other words, gun control articles are not new. They only contain recycled information by way of gun death statistics and familiar arguments used in a gun control debate. So, you may wonder why gun control articles are written. What is the need to present the same information in new form again and again?
The answer to this question lies in the fact that despite hundreds of gun control articles having been written dwelling on gun control pros and cons, the gun control issue still remains unresolved. A gun control article may highlight the fact that every year there are close to 30,000 deaths in America attributed to guns. But there are some people who are unmoved by these gun control facts. There is a powerful lobby called the National Rifles Association (NRA) whose sole agenda is to scuttle any move towards making gun control laws stronger.
The NRA is known for its familiar argument that any change in the gun control laws will be in violation of the 2nd amendment which has sanctioned the possession of guns by Americans. Some gun control articles take the pain of answering this objection by clarifying that this law, barring about 1 percent , was the work of people with no legal background. The NRA, however, will not listen to reason. Otherwise it would have been convinced by the fact that countries that have made the gun control laws tighter have succeeded in containing crime. The specific case of Australia having registered a steep decline in gun violence by 60 percent after it enacted a strong anti gun law is also not considered worth taking note of by the anti gun control groups.
I get disturbed whenever I read the gun death statistics. In general, statistics will make dull reading. After all, it is boring to go through the figures and understand them. But some kinds of statistics like gun crime statistics should be read by all even if it needs some effort to do that. The picture presented by gun death statistics will support the case for a strong gun control law.
Let us look at some of these gun death statistics. A study made on homicides in the United States shows that in 60 percent of the cases, the murders were committed by using guns. In fact, whenever we hear about a murder, before we know the details, we are likely to think that the murder was committed using a gun! Such is the association of gun with death. You may be shocked to know that every year 30,000 people are shot dead in the US. Gun control facts like this are only to be expected given the state of high gun ownership in our country.
You can find a lot more gun death statistics if you go through gun control articles. But none of these figures seem to have any effect on organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) who have made it a point to blindly oppose any gun control measure. The only way these people respond to gun death statistics is by claiming that in a democracy, there should be no control on guns. What they fail to understand is that democracy means rule of law and to ensure that the rule of law is properly implemented, tyranny has to be curbed. Tyranny resulting from guns should also be controlled in the interest of democracy.
The intransigence displayed by the NRA in spite of the grim realities presented by gun death statistics makes one perceive this body not as any kind of club but only as a paid lobby. This perception is confirmed by the policy of the NRA to not accept any compromise. It will not consider the gun control pros and cons and will not even look at the gun death statistics.
Sometimes, I wonder what the purpose of a gun control debate is. This is not like an academic debate that takes place either as a contest or as a form of entertainment. Gun control debate takes place at various levels making a threadbare analysis of gun control pros and cons with the aim of bringing out all the relevant facts and arguments into the public arena.
Unfortunately, the gun control debate has been going on for too long in our country. It has not thrown up any new issues. Gun control facts may need updating with new gun death statistics figures being compiled everyday. I have come across two updated gun crime statistics. One is that a high percentage of homicide crimes (about 60 percent ) are caused by the use of guns. The second one is the finding that strict gun control measures will bring down not only the number of murders but also the number of suicides. I am not sure whether the gun control debate will be enriched by this information since this is only a confirmation of the trend being witnessed over the past few decades.
But what is the response of the anti gun control lobby to these points brought out in the gun control debate? Either it should accept these facts or counter them, if it can. But opponents of gun control will do neither. They will only raise issues that have no bearing on the gun control facts. These people use frivolous arguments like the desirability of restricting the right to own guns that has been given to us by the 2nd amendment. Perhaps these people are not aware that about 99 percent of this act was prepared by people, though eminent and well versed in various fields, lacked a formal legal education. For its part, the National Rifles Association (NRA) has been threatening legislators that they would be defeated in the primaries and thus would not get a chance to be reelected if they supported gun control measures.
Not many people read gun control articles. The pages of newspapers and other periodicals and innumerable web pages are flooded with gun control articles. But what purpose will a gun control article serve if it is not read by many? I think that even if the articles are not read by many people, they still contribute to the gun control debate. This is because they carry a lot of information on gun control facts and these data can be used by anyone interested in studying the issue of gun control in detail.
I browsed through several gun control articles in the internet and was astonished at the vastness and depth of the information provided by them. Some of the gun crime statistics they provided were astonishing. For the first time, I learnt that the United states, one of the leading countries of the world performed worse than a relatively less advanced country like South Africa when the gun death figures were expressed as a percentage of population. It was difficult for me to digest that the US was ranked worse than South Africa in an issue relating to the safety of human lives.
Gun control articles also provided the answer to the question as to why the US performed worse than South Africa by presenting another set of gun crime statistics. The answer lay in the fact that the US citizens owned a disproportionately larger share of the guns in the world! The logical conclusion that fewer guns resulted in less crime was confirmed by the information given in another gun control essay.
Gun control articles currently being written should aim to answer the arguments raised by the anti gun control groups like the National Rifles Association (NRA). For example, the argument that gun ownership rights are given to us by the 2nd amendment can be met by making the point that the people behind creating this amendment had no legal background. Therefore, putting some reasonable restrictions on gun ownership cannot be deemed wrong.
Gun control articles should also bring to light the dubious ways of the NRA in threatening the legislators to toe its line if they did not want to lose their primaries.
I welcome gun control articles. They make their own contribution to the cause of gun control. Obviously a gun control article may support or oppose making gun control stronger. But either way, they will be making a valuable contribution to the gun control debate. The only thing I will expect from good gun control articles is that they should state gun control facts truthfully.
There are a number of studies resulting in gun crime statistics. The picture revealed by these figures will not but disturb anyone who values human life. Gun control articles will be doing a great service to the cause of gun control if they present gun death statistics appropriately, even if the articles are written opposing legislation putting curbs on owning and using guns.
People should be aware of gun control pros and cons so that they can formulate their opinions objectively. Otherwise they may be carried away by sentimental arguments that depict owning guns as a right conferred on us by the 2nd amendment. We have organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) that describe themselves as an association of sports people obscuring the fact that they are highly paid lobbies campaigning against any restrictions on guns. We have several pro NRA legislators who scuttle the efforts of institutions like the National Institute of health even studying gun violence. Gun control articles can probe the question whether the NRA is a political organization or a body of lobbyists. By presenting gun death statistics objectively, gun control articles will serve as a forum to counter propaganda with truth.
Gun control articles should highlight facts relating to the issue of gun death. For example, they can enlighten the readers of the fact that guns are used not only for murders but also for suicides. The message that gun control laws can prevent our near and dear ones from resorting to suicide on some emotional moment by putting restrictions on the availability of guns to anyone and everyone can be effectively conveyed by well written gun control articles.
Gun control facts are useful in assessing the situation arising out of the present system of uncontrolled gun ownership. Any objective person will be interested in looking at the gun control pros and cons before making up his mind on the controversial issue of gun control. Gun control facts facilitate an dispassionate understanding of the issue without being carried away by rhetorical claims that since the right to own a gun is derived from the 2nd amendment, such a right cannot be taken away by law.
Gun control facts include public information about the effectiveness or otherwise of strong gun control measures implemented in other countries and gun death statistics showing how gun death has a strong correlation with gun ownership. For example, the fact that Australia was able to bring down gun deaths by 60 percent is a strong pointer to the power of legislation in curbing violence. If we read this information along with the data provided by gun control facts that regions that have more privately owned guns have consistently reported a larger number of children being killed, we can understand that gun control will have a positive impact and that failure to control gun ownership can only increase the incidence of gun death.
Unfortunately, gun crime statistics do not seem to move some people. There are groups like the National Rifles Association (NRA) that are bent upon scuttling any move towards even a moderate gun control law. It does not matter to them if 30,000 people in America become the victims of gun violence every year. Nor will these groups be concerned about the yearly loss suffered by the US economy to the tune of $3.70 billion. Undeterred by all these negative effects revealed by gun control facts, the NRA is adamant on its anti gun control stand. Such obstinacy in the face of damning gun control facts makes one justifiably question the claim of NRA to be a political organization and deem it to be rather a grouping of lobbyists.
In the wake of the massacre at Newtown, much of the gun control debate has focused on stricter regulations on military assault rifles. However, an examination of gun control facts in America clearly shows that new regulations must limit the spread of handguns as well.
Government gun control facts show that two thirds of all US murders committed with a gun, the homicide is accomplished using a HANDGUN. Apparently, military style weapons of mass destruction are the preferred tools for those intent on killing many people quickly. The AVERAGE murder however is the result of shooting someone with a pistol.
In Great Britain there are about 550 homicides per year (2011). In the USA there were 12,664 murders of which 8583 were from hand guns.
These gun crime statistics are astonishing. That means that in America there are TWENTY THREE people killed for every ONE in England, Ireland, Wales and Scotland combined!
Gun control articles also show that there is a very real correlation between gun deaths and the number of households with guns. In the six states with the highest rates of gun ownership, an average of 53 percent of households owned firearms; in the four states with the lowest rates of gun ownership, an average of 13 percent of households contained firearms. From 1988 to 1997, the high gun states had more than 21,000 individuals who were homicide victims, compared with 7,300 in the low gun states. If you lived in a high gun state you were 4.2 times more likely to die in a gun related homicide than those who in the low gun states.
Gun death statistics are REAL. Gun control facts tell us the truth about gun crime.
As Americans look to create more effective gun control laws we must ensure that gun control facts become well known. Statistics to speak to us. Gun laws that don’t limit handguns will not limit gun deaths.
With the issue of gun control having become so controversial over the years, it will be useful to look at the gun control pros and cons so that a balanced view can be arrived at. Let us look at some facts including gun crime statistics and analyze them. As can only be expected, all kinds of statistics including gun death statistics are being used to their advantage by people engaged in a gun control debate. We will look at the facts more objectively.
At the outset, it is essential to demolish the specious argument put up by some people that gun ownership will reduce crime. These people base their argument on the reasoning that a gun will act as deterrent on a person intending to commit a crime. What they fail to consider is that in the absence of effective gun control laws, criminals are more likely to possess and use guns than people seeking to defend themselves. This argument is based on a simplistic assumption and there is no evidence to support it.
On the other hand, gun crime statistics reveal a picture that is totally different. There are gun control articles dealing with gun control pros and cons that carry gun death statistics. One such gun control article says that every year, about 30,000 people in the US die from gun wounds. The number includes men, women and children. Another study has come out with the finding that there are more suicides in regions that have more gun ownership.
While considering the gun control pros and cons, we should also look at the situation in other countries. Comparative gun death statistics by way of the percentage of gun deaths for different countries, computed as a ratio of number of gun deaths to the total, shows the US to be worse than South Africa.
A detailed study of gun control pros and cons using gun control facts and statistics will point towards the urgent need for a stronger gun control regime.
Gun control articles focus on the dangers resulting from misuse of guns by people who own guns. Every gun control article uses several research facts to support the demand that gun control laws should be made more stringent. Some of the research facts used by gun control articles are:
1) About 60 percent of homicides that occur in the United States result from the use of guns. This fact strongly suggests that killers find guns to be a convenient weapon to use on the victims.
2) There are gun crime statistics showing the number of deaths caused by guns for a population of 10,000. When these figures are compared for different countries, the US fares worse than South Africa. That is to say, proportionately more gun deaths take place in the US than in South Africa. Gun death statistics are a strong basis for supporting stringent legislation on gun control.
3) Another disturbing fact cited by gun control articles is that about 40 percent of the kids know where their gun owning parents keep the guns in their houses. So, they can get ready access to the guns. This should cause some worry to anyone.
4) One more fact involving children is that in areas where gun ownership is high, the incidence of gun death is also high. Gun control articles point out that this correlation is too strong and too damning to be ignored or taken lightly.
5) If you think that guns can cause only deaths and injuries, you are wrong. Guns can play havoc with the Economy as well. A gun control essay quotes research studies to show that there is an economic loss associated with guns too. And the loss estimated is huge standing at $3.7 billion per annum. This should make even the people managing the treasury to come out in support of strong gun control measures!
Gun control articles are thus able to build a strong case for tightening the laws, using research facts that cant be disputed by anyone.
Another piece of statistics that may have an unsettling effect on you is that a larger
number of children have been victims of homicide in places where a larger number of
households have owned guns. If you have supported uncontrolled gun ownership with
the expectation that it would give protection to your family including children, you will
now realize the irony of the situation.
People who believe that possession of guns by a large number of people may not cause
any danger to the society on the ground that most of the people will have the guns only
for their self-protection may find that gun control facts revealing that guns cause 30,000
deaths per annum in the U.S. shatter their belief.
The problems caused by gun ownership go beyond posing a serious threat to human
lives. They extend into the sphere of Economics as well. Astonishing as the figure may
seem, the economic damages caused by guns are valued at $3.7 billion per year.
Gun control facts stated above are not exhaustive. But even this limited information has
the potential to change your mind on gun control.