One gun control article I read yesterday had some new pieces of statistical data that I have not come across before. I have read many gun control articles listing innumerable gun control facts. In fact the gun control debate is kept alive by many a gun control article that hits the readers almost on a daily basis. The new gun crime statistics revealed by this gun control article are given below.
1)One of the most surprising piece of information provided by this gun control article is about the number of guns owned by the American people. This data is given as the number of guns for 100 people. i was shocked to find that this ratio is 89. That means for every 100 people living in our country, we have 89 guns!
2) With such a large number of guns relative to the population, we can only expect that the crime rate will be high. Gun death statistics presented in this article show that guns are used in about 60 percent of the murders (or homicides as they are usually referred to). The more guns are with the people, the more seem to be the number of gun deaths.
3) The conclusion that gun crime will increase in proportion to the gun ownership was confirmed by this gun control article by showing the positive effects of gun control. Two significant facts were reported in this gun control article. The first was the report of a study that found that countries which have implemented strict gun control laws experienced a decline in the number of murders. The second fact was more specific, describing the experience of Australia. Australia was one country that took the wise decision to bring in a strict gun control regime. This has resulted in a sharp decrease in gun violence by about 60 percent in that country.
4) Another stunning information provided by this gun control article concerned the US economy. It brought out the fact that the effect of gun violence was felt by the US economy also as seen by the fact that the United States has been losing close to four billion dollars every year on account of gun violence.
Gun control articles are doing a good job. They have succeeded in putting the issue of gun control in perspective. The need for this has arisen because the anti gun control lobby has been working overtime to thwart all efforts to make gun control laws stronger. People who are opposed to gun control do not seem to take notice of the gun control facts that show the severity of the problem of gun crime. These people are not perturbed by gun crime statistics depicting the extent of gun violence caused by uncontrolled gun ownership, but keep registering their opposition to gun control laws in general.
If we go through the gun death statistics that are recorded in gun control articles, we can see that a large number of people are becoming victims of gun death. When figures for the number of gun deaths as a ratio of the population are compiled for different countries and compared, the United States occupies a position at a much lower level than does South Africa. This is one of the facts highlighted by gun control articles.
Notwithstanding the fact that gun control articles have listed the gun control pros and cons, thereby making it easy for the people to analyze these details and evaluate them for themselves, some legislators are busy making rules that will effectively block independent organizations like the National Institute of Health from studying gun violence. These legislators are obviously toeing the line of the National Rifles Association (NRA), which has been opposing gun control measures strongly.
If we compare the picture presented by gun control articles on the one hand and the activities of the anti gun control lobby on the other, we cannot but question the status of the NRA. Though the NRA calls itself an association of sports persons, it has been functioning more like a paid lobby. The NRA does not even qualify to be a political organization because it does not offer credible arguments in support of its stand the way gun control articles do. The NRA can only be called a lobbyist body.
The gun control debate is not new. It has been there for the past four decades and more. Yet the gun control debate is being carried on everyday in the newspapers and the electronic media as if it is something new! Gun control pros and cons are repeatedly presented making the audience lose interest in the gun control debate itself.
I suggest that we all join the gun control debate. Though the debate has been going on, there is an imperative need to strengthen the case for gun control. I would suggest that people who are in favor of strong gun control legislation should participate in the debate and strengthen the cause of gun control. Some of the gun crime statistics that should be presented in the gun control debate are as below.
The ratio of guns to population of a country is the highest for the US with a figure of 89 guns for 1000 people. This is undoubtedly a high figure. The effect of this abnormal gun ownership is reflected in the gun death statistics showing that over 60 percent of the homicides occurring in the US involve the use of guns. The message is clear. When you allow people to own guns indiscriminately, the chances of guns being used in crimes will be high.
People who are opposed to any kind of control on the use of guns take shelter under the second amendment. what they ignore is the fact that a major part of this amendment constituting about 99 percent was the creation of people who had no college education. While this fact will cause no reflection on their competence, it shows that amending the law is not something sacrilegious.
The National Rifles Association (NRA) which spearheads the opposition to meaning gun control measures is not interested in a healthy gun control debate. Since it follows a policy of not compromising on its obstinate opposition to gun control, it resorts to untenable arguments to support its position. It says that in a democracy, there should be no gun control guns. Democracy does not mean the absence of controls. In fact, democracy has to fight tyranny of any kind. Gun control measures are one way of fighting lawlessness. Looked from this perspective, the points raised by the NRA have no place in a gun control debate.
Though the issue of gun control has been in the debating arena for the past few decades, the real issues governing this are sometimes misunderstood. Sometimes the issues are even intentionally sought to be confused. In my opinion, the question of making gun control more effective has to be studied only by taking into account gun control facts.
What are gun control facts? They include gun crime statistics which portray the relationship between gun ownership and gun death. For example, take this data from the gun death statistics figures presented in gun control articles. According to one such gun control article, thirty thousand people in America are killed by guns every year. This is an example of a real issue governing gun control laws. This fact makes a mockery of the argument advanced by the pro gun lobby that if people have guns they will be able to defend themselves better.
Another information damaging to the cause of unrestrained gun ownership is that the number of women and children becoming victims of gun violence is higher in places where the number of people who own guns is higher. This fact also contradicts the claim made in some quarters that owning guns will give more protection to the families of the gun owners. The result seems to be the opposite of the claim. Read this along with the fact that the rates of suicides are also high in areas where the ratios of gun owning people are high and you have a perfect picture. The more the number of guns, the more will be the incidence of death, either by way of murders or by way of suicides.
The response to these figures from the anti gun control people is disappointing. While some people use the 2nd amendment to claim the right to own guns ignoring the fact that about 99 percent of this amendment was written down by people with no advantage of a legal education, others like the National Rifles Association (NRA) choose to use coercive methods. The NRA is known to be threatening the legislators that it will work for defeating them in the primaries if they fail to oppose any gun control legislation
Gun control articles are written with a view to bring the issue of gun control into public focus. One who writes a gun control essay need not be an expert. Anyone can find an abundance of gun crime statistics at various places. You can find them in the current editions of periodicals as well as in the archives. You can also find them in various websites that are dedicated to presenting gun control facts.
In other words, gun control articles are not new. They only contain recycled information by way of gun death statistics and familiar arguments used in a gun control debate. So, you may wonder why gun control articles are written. What is the need to present the same information in new form again and again?
The answer to this question lies in the fact that despite hundreds of gun control articles having been written dwelling on gun control pros and cons, the gun control issue still remains unresolved. A gun control article may highlight the fact that every year there are close to 30,000 deaths in America attributed to guns. But there are some people who are unmoved by these gun control facts. There is a powerful lobby called the National Rifles Association (NRA) whose sole agenda is to scuttle any move towards making gun control laws stronger.
The NRA is known for its familiar argument that any change in the gun control laws will be in violation of the 2nd amendment which has sanctioned the possession of guns by Americans. Some gun control articles take the pain of answering this objection by clarifying that this law, barring about 1 percent , was the work of people with no legal background. The NRA, however, will not listen to reason. Otherwise it would have been convinced by the fact that countries that have made the gun control laws tighter have succeeded in containing crime. The specific case of Australia having registered a steep decline in gun violence by 60 percent after it enacted a strong anti gun law is also not considered worth taking note of by the anti gun control groups.
I get disturbed whenever I read the gun death statistics. In general, statistics will make dull reading. After all, it is boring to go through the figures and understand them. But some kinds of statistics like gun crime statistics should be read by all even if it needs some effort to do that. The picture presented by gun death statistics will support the case for a strong gun control law.
Let us look at some of these gun death statistics. A study made on homicides in the United States shows that in 60 percent of the cases, the murders were committed by using guns. In fact, whenever we hear about a murder, before we know the details, we are likely to think that the murder was committed using a gun! Such is the association of gun with death. You may be shocked to know that every year 30,000 people are shot dead in the US. Gun control facts like this are only to be expected given the state of high gun ownership in our country.
You can find a lot more gun death statistics if you go through gun control articles. But none of these figures seem to have any effect on organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) who have made it a point to blindly oppose any gun control measure. The only way these people respond to gun death statistics is by claiming that in a democracy, there should be no control on guns. What they fail to understand is that democracy means rule of law and to ensure that the rule of law is properly implemented, tyranny has to be curbed. Tyranny resulting from guns should also be controlled in the interest of democracy.
The intransigence displayed by the NRA in spite of the grim realities presented by gun death statistics makes one perceive this body not as any kind of club but only as a paid lobby. This perception is confirmed by the policy of the NRA to not accept any compromise. It will not consider the gun control pros and cons and will not even look at the gun death statistics.
Sometimes, I wonder what the purpose of a gun control debate is. This is not like an academic debate that takes place either as a contest or as a form of entertainment. Gun control debate takes place at various levels making a threadbare analysis of gun control pros and cons with the aim of bringing out all the relevant facts and arguments into the public arena.
Unfortunately, the gun control debate has been going on for too long in our country. It has not thrown up any new issues. Gun control facts may need updating with new gun death statistics figures being compiled everyday. I have come across two updated gun crime statistics. One is that a high percentage of homicide crimes (about 60 percent ) are caused by the use of guns. The second one is the finding that strict gun control measures will bring down not only the number of murders but also the number of suicides. I am not sure whether the gun control debate will be enriched by this information since this is only a confirmation of the trend being witnessed over the past few decades.
But what is the response of the anti gun control lobby to these points brought out in the gun control debate? Either it should accept these facts or counter them, if it can. But opponents of gun control will do neither. They will only raise issues that have no bearing on the gun control facts. These people use frivolous arguments like the desirability of restricting the right to own guns that has been given to us by the 2nd amendment. Perhaps these people are not aware that about 99 percent of this act was prepared by people, though eminent and well versed in various fields, lacked a formal legal education. For its part, the National Rifles Association (NRA) has been threatening legislators that they would be defeated in the primaries and thus would not get a chance to be reelected if they supported gun control measures.
Not many people read gun control articles. The pages of newspapers and other periodicals and innumerable web pages are flooded with gun control articles. But what purpose will a gun control article serve if it is not read by many? I think that even if the articles are not read by many people, they still contribute to the gun control debate. This is because they carry a lot of information on gun control facts and these data can be used by anyone interested in studying the issue of gun control in detail.
I browsed through several gun control articles in the internet and was astonished at the vastness and depth of the information provided by them. Some of the gun crime statistics they provided were astonishing. For the first time, I learnt that the United states, one of the leading countries of the world performed worse than a relatively less advanced country like South Africa when the gun death figures were expressed as a percentage of population. It was difficult for me to digest that the US was ranked worse than South Africa in an issue relating to the safety of human lives.
Gun control articles also provided the answer to the question as to why the US performed worse than South Africa by presenting another set of gun crime statistics. The answer lay in the fact that the US citizens owned a disproportionately larger share of the guns in the world! The logical conclusion that fewer guns resulted in less crime was confirmed by the information given in another gun control essay.
Gun control articles currently being written should aim to answer the arguments raised by the anti gun control groups like the National Rifles Association (NRA). For example, the argument that gun ownership rights are given to us by the 2nd amendment can be met by making the point that the people behind creating this amendment had no legal background. Therefore, putting some reasonable restrictions on gun ownership cannot be deemed wrong.
Gun control articles should also bring to light the dubious ways of the NRA in threatening the legislators to toe its line if they did not want to lose their primaries.
I welcome gun control articles. They make their own contribution to the cause of gun control. Obviously a gun control article may support or oppose making gun control stronger. But either way, they will be making a valuable contribution to the gun control debate. The only thing I will expect from good gun control articles is that they should state gun control facts truthfully.
There are a number of studies resulting in gun crime statistics. The picture revealed by these figures will not but disturb anyone who values human life. Gun control articles will be doing a great service to the cause of gun control if they present gun death statistics appropriately, even if the articles are written opposing legislation putting curbs on owning and using guns.
People should be aware of gun control pros and cons so that they can formulate their opinions objectively. Otherwise they may be carried away by sentimental arguments that depict owning guns as a right conferred on us by the 2nd amendment. We have organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) that describe themselves as an association of sports people obscuring the fact that they are highly paid lobbies campaigning against any restrictions on guns. We have several pro NRA legislators who scuttle the efforts of institutions like the National Institute of health even studying gun violence. Gun control articles can probe the question whether the NRA is a political organization or a body of lobbyists. By presenting gun death statistics objectively, gun control articles will serve as a forum to counter propaganda with truth.
Gun control articles should highlight facts relating to the issue of gun death. For example, they can enlighten the readers of the fact that guns are used not only for murders but also for suicides. The message that gun control laws can prevent our near and dear ones from resorting to suicide on some emotional moment by putting restrictions on the availability of guns to anyone and everyone can be effectively conveyed by well written gun control articles.
Gun control facts are useful in assessing the situation arising out of the present system of uncontrolled gun ownership. Any objective person will be interested in looking at the gun control pros and cons before making up his mind on the controversial issue of gun control. Gun control facts facilitate an dispassionate understanding of the issue without being carried away by rhetorical claims that since the right to own a gun is derived from the 2nd amendment, such a right cannot be taken away by law.
Gun control facts include public information about the effectiveness or otherwise of strong gun control measures implemented in other countries and gun death statistics showing how gun death has a strong correlation with gun ownership. For example, the fact that Australia was able to bring down gun deaths by 60 percent is a strong pointer to the power of legislation in curbing violence. If we read this information along with the data provided by gun control facts that regions that have more privately owned guns have consistently reported a larger number of children being killed, we can understand that gun control will have a positive impact and that failure to control gun ownership can only increase the incidence of gun death.
Unfortunately, gun crime statistics do not seem to move some people. There are groups like the National Rifles Association (NRA) that are bent upon scuttling any move towards even a moderate gun control law. It does not matter to them if 30,000 people in America become the victims of gun violence every year. Nor will these groups be concerned about the yearly loss suffered by the US economy to the tune of $3.70 billion. Undeterred by all these negative effects revealed by gun control facts, the NRA is adamant on its anti gun control stand. Such obstinacy in the face of damning gun control facts makes one justifiably question the claim of NRA to be a political organization and deem it to be rather a grouping of lobbyists.