Gun control facts will have value only if they are used properly. Facts by themselves have no value. It is what we derive from facts that will deliver value. To make gun control facts useful, we should first understand them and then analyze and interpret them. Often, opinions are confused with facts. While facts are real, opinions are reflections of one’s thinking. Therefore in analyzing gun control facts, we should be able to separate facts from opinions.
Where do we find gun control facts? We can spot them in newspaper reports and in several other places. We can readily access these facts in gun control articles dealing with gun control pros and cons. Let us start with some gun crime statistics. It is often claimed by opponents of gun control that the idea of allowing people own guns is to prevent crime. Obviously, this is an opinion and this can be valid only if it is supported by facts. No evidence has been found in support of this view. Gun death statistics only show the opposite to be true.
Gun control facts also include information on gun ownership. Studies have shown that we have about 90 guns for a population of 100 in our country. This is a fact but what conclusion can we derive from them? A simple interpretation of this is that on an average, almost every American has a gun! If we exclude children, then it will mean that there is more than one gun for each person residing in the US. We can understand the potential for danger from this abnormally high gun ownership. Another study shows that suicide rates are high in those regions that have a large gun owning population. This suggests that gun ownership leads not only to murders but also to suicides.
Gun control facts are sometimes countered by arguments. One such argument is that in a democracy, there is no place for any control including gun control. This argument fails to consider that curbs on gun ownership are needed to prevent tyranny, which will be a direct threat to democracy. With gun control facts strongly favoring a stricter gun control legislation, the pro gun lobby adopts various means to sabotage any move towards gun control. The action of some pro NRA (National Rifles Association) in making rules that make it difficult for the CDC to study gun violence is an example of this.
We will expect that people who become aware of gun crime statistics will be concerned about the loss of human lives and will think of doing something by way of making gun control more effective. But there are certain groups who seem to be totally unconcerned by gun death. This attitude looks perplexing. How can anyone be impervious to such gun crime statistics that show that children become the biggest victims of gun ownership? Gun death statistics have established that a lot more children have been dying in those regions where there are a large number of households possessing guns. This fact alone is sufficient to demolish the argument of the anti gun control groups that guns offer protection to those who own them and their family members.
But people who are not interested in a meaningful gun control debate are not moved by these appalling facts. They show no interest in understanding the gun control pros and cons and persist with their agenda of unrestricted gun ownership. The groups that are unmoved by gun crime statistics includes the National Rifles Association (NRA). The NRA calls itself an association of sports persons but in practice, functions like a lobby. The NRA is said to have forced several legislators to support its stand in the gun control issue by threatening them that they will be defeated in the primaries if they do not fall in line with the stand of the NRA.
The fact that some legislators have chosen to ignore gun crime statistics and have been doing everything in their power to work against gun control is revealed by their actions. For example, the pro NRA legislators have been creating new rules with a view to preventing the CDC from studying gun violence. The fact that they have been adopting a similar ploy to stymie the efforts of another independent organization,the National Institute of Health, reveals a pattern in their approach and raises questions about their motives. Gun crime statistics will have no impact on such people blinded by a single point agenda of uncontrolled gun ownership irrespective of its consequences.
It is in keeping with the healthy practice of looking at both the sides of an issue that gun control pros and cons are being considered. In any gun control debate, people taking up positions on either side will present their arguments supporting them with facts and figures on the one hand and logical arguments on the other. Gun control pros and cons include gun crime statistics which cannot be ignored while studying the issue of gun control.
Let us take a few gun control pros and cons to understand the topic in proper perspective. What are the gun control facts supporting stricter gun control laws? Gun death statistics have brought out the fact that in areas where more people own guns, gun crimes are also more. In fact, a study shows that not only murders but even suicides increase with the number of guns in a place. It is an irony that while the pro gun ownership people claim that having a gun is a good way protecting oneself and one’s family, the reality is that it increases the chances of gun death in the family by way of murder or suicide.
The other side of the above mentioned fact is also revealed by gun crime statistics. The number of murders is smaller in countries where the number of guns is smaller. Thus, gun control pros and cons show that gun crime varies directly with the number of guns. Another fact to be included in the gun control pros and cons is that 39 percent of the children know where guns are kept in their houses! This shocking revelation raises the question of safety arising from gun ownership. How are we going to stop the children from using guns indiscriminately?
Now, what are the gun control pros and cons raised by the anti gun control lobby? This lobby which is led by the National Rifles Association (NRA) does not bother to present arguments in support of its stand. The NRA has made it clear that it will not compromise on its stand. This means that gun control pros and cons will have no impact on the thinking of the anti gun control groups. The action of the pro NRA legislators in placing obstacles on the path of CDC in its efforts to study gun violence is in keeping with this attitude.
The gun control debate is not new. It has been there for the past four decades and more. Yet the gun control debate is being carried on everyday in the newspapers and the electronic media as if it is something new! Gun control pros and cons are repeatedly presented making the audience lose interest in the gun control debate itself.
I suggest that we all join the gun control debate. Though the debate has been going on, there is an imperative need to strengthen the case for gun control. I would suggest that people who are in favor of strong gun control legislation should participate in the debate and strengthen the cause of gun control. Some of the gun crime statistics that should be presented in the gun control debate are as below.
The ratio of guns to population of a country is the highest for the US with a figure of 89 guns for 1000 people. This is undoubtedly a high figure. The effect of this abnormal gun ownership is reflected in the gun death statistics showing that over 60 percent of the homicides occurring in the US involve the use of guns. The message is clear. When you allow people to own guns indiscriminately, the chances of guns being used in crimes will be high.
People who are opposed to any kind of control on the use of guns take shelter under the second amendment. what they ignore is the fact that a major part of this amendment constituting about 99 percent was the creation of people who had no college education. While this fact will cause no reflection on their competence, it shows that amending the law is not something sacrilegious.
The National Rifles Association (NRA) which spearheads the opposition to meaning gun control measures is not interested in a healthy gun control debate. Since it follows a policy of not compromising on its obstinate opposition to gun control, it resorts to untenable arguments to support its position. It says that in a democracy, there should be no gun control guns. Democracy does not mean the absence of controls. In fact, democracy has to fight tyranny of any kind. Gun control measures are one way of fighting lawlessness. Looked from this perspective, the points raised by the NRA have no place in a gun control debate.
I get disturbed whenever I read the gun death statistics. In general, statistics will make dull reading. After all, it is boring to go through the figures and understand them. But some kinds of statistics like gun crime statistics should be read by all even if it needs some effort to do that. The picture presented by gun death statistics will support the case for a strong gun control law.
Let us look at some of these gun death statistics. A study made on homicides in the United States shows that in 60 percent of the cases, the murders were committed by using guns. In fact, whenever we hear about a murder, before we know the details, we are likely to think that the murder was committed using a gun! Such is the association of gun with death. You may be shocked to know that every year 30,000 people are shot dead in the US. Gun control facts like this are only to be expected given the state of high gun ownership in our country.
You can find a lot more gun death statistics if you go through gun control articles. But none of these figures seem to have any effect on organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) who have made it a point to blindly oppose any gun control measure. The only way these people respond to gun death statistics is by claiming that in a democracy, there should be no control on guns. What they fail to understand is that democracy means rule of law and to ensure that the rule of law is properly implemented, tyranny has to be curbed. Tyranny resulting from guns should also be controlled in the interest of democracy.
The intransigence displayed by the NRA in spite of the grim realities presented by gun death statistics makes one perceive this body not as any kind of club but only as a paid lobby. This perception is confirmed by the policy of the NRA to not accept any compromise. It will not consider the gun control pros and cons and will not even look at the gun death statistics.
Gun control articles focus on the dangers resulting from misuse of guns by people who own guns. Every gun control article uses several research facts to support the demand that gun control laws should be made more stringent. Some of the research facts used by gun control articles are:
1) About 60 percent of homicides that occur in the United States result from the use of guns. This fact strongly suggests that killers find guns to be a convenient weapon to use on the victims.
2) There are gun crime statistics showing the number of deaths caused by guns for a population of 10,000. When these figures are compared for different countries, the US fares worse than South Africa. That is to say, proportionately more gun deaths take place in the US than in South Africa. Gun death statistics are a strong basis for supporting stringent legislation on gun control.
3) Another disturbing fact cited by gun control articles is that about 40 percent of the kids know where their gun owning parents keep the guns in their houses. So, they can get ready access to the guns. This should cause some worry to anyone.
4) One more fact involving children is that in areas where gun ownership is high, the incidence of gun death is also high. Gun control articles point out that this correlation is too strong and too damning to be ignored or taken lightly.
5) If you think that guns can cause only deaths and injuries, you are wrong. Guns can play havoc with the Economy as well. A gun control essay quotes research studies to show that there is an economic loss associated with guns too. And the loss estimated is huge standing at $3.7 billion per annum. This should make even the people managing the treasury to come out in support of strong gun control measures!
Gun control articles are thus able to build a strong case for tightening the laws, using research facts that cant be disputed by anyone.
Another piece of statistics that may have an unsettling effect on you is that a larger
number of children have been victims of homicide in places where a larger number of
households have owned guns. If you have supported uncontrolled gun ownership with
the expectation that it would give protection to your family including children, you will
now realize the irony of the situation.
People who believe that possession of guns by a large number of people may not cause
any danger to the society on the ground that most of the people will have the guns only
for their self-protection may find that gun control facts revealing that guns cause 30,000
deaths per annum in the U.S. shatter their belief.
The problems caused by gun ownership go beyond posing a serious threat to human
lives. They extend into the sphere of Economics as well. Astonishing as the figure may
seem, the economic damages caused by guns are valued at $3.7 billion per year.
Gun control facts stated above are not exhaustive. But even this limited information has
the potential to change your mind on gun control.
If you are a person who is against stricter laws to control the ownership of guns, gun
control facts which I will be presenting here will, in all probability, change your mind.
You might have come across and even dealt with many arguments, both for and against
gun control laws. After all, this is one of the topics that are constantly being debated
almost continuously. People who are against laws seeking to control the possession
and use of guns and other firearms will no doubt have strong reasons to justify their
convictions. But, there are times when we have to look at the facts and reevaluate our
Everyone is concerned at the increasing rate at which homicides occur in several states
and in the country as a whole. Information collected about the homicides reveals a
shocking picture. About 60 percent of the homicides are committed by the use of guns
or other firearms. It is only realistic to expect that any weapon can be used for purposes
for which it was not intended. But won’t you agree that the figure 60 percent is a bit, if
not highly, alarming?
Now, let us look at another picture from the arsenal of gun control facts. Considering
that deaths are being caused by guns in almost all countries of the world, comparative
studies are invariably made. One such study places the United States at a situation
worse than that of South Africa, for the number of deaths per 10,000 citizens.
Gun control facts relating to children are even more alarming. One study reveals
that 39 percent of kids knew where their parents stored their guns. If you can digest
this information, you may begin to understand why the incidents of kids using guns
inappropriately and causing deaths keep increasing by the year. When you realize that
the guns are not safe in our homes, won’t you reexamine your views on gun control
Seriously, where can you find gun control facts that are not full of politics? I know there are people out there looking on the Internet for the statistics and facts that will help them decide their views on gun control. I want to help that cause by providing gun control facts here on my site.