We cannot take gun death incidents lightly. Crime is inevitable in any society and gun deaths are bound to occur. But when we find a larger number of deaths occurring due to gun violence, we cannot treat these incidents as natural or unavoidable. When we see gun death statistics in newspapers everyday, our conscience is disturbed. We ask ourselves: Can we not bring down gun violence through better gun control?
Let us take a look at some gun control facts to understand the severity of the problem of gun control. You will be shocked to know that we have about 90 guns for every 100 people living in the United States. When the density of gun ownership is so high, is it not necessary that something is done to check this? People do not own guns for fun. The scenario of so many people being armed with guns is a pointer to the potential for great danger from gun crime.
People who have been advocating unrestricted gun ownership have been arguing that when people have guns, they can protect themselves from attacks by criminal elements and this in turn will result in decrease in crime. But gun crime statistics show that there is not only no evidence for this perverse logic but that the evidence supports the opposite viewpoint as well. Far from having a salutary effect on crime, gun ownership only contributes to increase in crime. As pointed out by many gun control articles based on several studies, the larger the number of guns in an area, the larger are the number of murders and suicides in that area. The fact that gun ownership encourages suicides is highly disturbing.
Countries that have implemented strict gun control laws have been able to reduce the incidence of gun death. Interestingly, gun death statistics from these countries show that stricter gun laws not only bring down the number of murders but also the number of suicides.
Notwithstanding such strong evidence showing that only tough gun control laws can bring down the incidence of gun death, organizations like the NRA (National Rifles Association) have been opposing any move towards tightening gun control laws. This attitude of the NRA leads us to the inference that the NRA is neither a club nor an association of sportsmen but is just a lobby. There cannot be any other explanation for the NRA not getting perturbed by gun death statistics.
The print media abound with gun control articles. These articles have been written over a period of several years. The objective of the people who write these articles is to inform readers of gun control facts and help them understand the issue in the right perspective. The contribution made by gun control articles is very significant since in a gun control debate, we often hear only points supporting one side. Gun control pros and cons are not objectively discussed there. Since gun control articles are written by different people at various points of time, the information contained in them is more comprehensive and will cover the diverse aspects of the gun control issue.
In addition to listing gun crime statistics, gun control articles also take up the arguments advanced by both the supporters and opponents of gun control and analyse them. Since the opposition to gun control is led by the NRA (National Rifles Association), the role of NRA and its attitude come under scrutiny in gun control articles. It is good that the unethical practices of the NRA and its supporters is brought to light so that people could realize what the facts are. Here are some shocking truths about the NRA as revealed by gun control articles.
Contrary to the claim of the NRA that it is an association of sportsmen, it has been functioning as a lobby of gun control opponents. It also does things which lobbyists normally do. The NRA is known to have issued a threat to many legislators that they should espouse the anti gun control cause failing which the NRA would work for defeating them in the primaries thus denying them a chance to contest in elections! Unfortunately, this threat seems to be having its effect at least on some legislators. This can be seen from the blatantly partisan role played by some legislators. Some legislators have gone to the extent of altering the rules in such a way that independent organizations like the National Institute of Health will find even studying gun violence difficult. A similar situation has been created for the CDC, another independent body engaged in studying gun violence. We cannot blame people who feel that the NRA is not a gun club but a highly paid lobby. With one side resorting to such unethical practices, we need gun control articles to educate people of the real issues involved.
We will expect that people who become aware of gun crime statistics will be concerned about the loss of human lives and will think of doing something by way of making gun control more effective. But there are certain groups who seem to be totally unconcerned by gun death. This attitude looks perplexing. How can anyone be impervious to such gun crime statistics that show that children become the biggest victims of gun ownership? Gun death statistics have established that a lot more children have been dying in those regions where there are a large number of households possessing guns. This fact alone is sufficient to demolish the argument of the anti gun control groups that guns offer protection to those who own them and their family members.
But people who are not interested in a meaningful gun control debate are not moved by these appalling facts. They show no interest in understanding the gun control pros and cons and persist with their agenda of unrestricted gun ownership. The groups that are unmoved by gun crime statistics includes the National Rifles Association (NRA). The NRA calls itself an association of sports persons but in practice, functions like a lobby. The NRA is said to have forced several legislators to support its stand in the gun control issue by threatening them that they will be defeated in the primaries if they do not fall in line with the stand of the NRA.
The fact that some legislators have chosen to ignore gun crime statistics and have been doing everything in their power to work against gun control is revealed by their actions. For example, the pro NRA legislators have been creating new rules with a view to preventing the CDC from studying gun violence. The fact that they have been adopting a similar ploy to stymie the efforts of another independent organization,the National Institute of Health, reveals a pattern in their approach and raises questions about their motives. Gun crime statistics will have no impact on such people blinded by a single point agenda of uncontrolled gun ownership irrespective of its consequences.
Gun crime statistics are a reliable indicator of the perils of unrestricted gun ownership. People who oppose any kind of law that will restrict owning and using guns cannot close their eyes to the scenario revealed by gun death statistics. Let us take a look at a few gun control facts to understand the gun control debate in a proper perspective.
1) We will start with the gun ownership data which has a direct bearing on gun crime statistics. Do you know how many guns are there in the United States? The absolute number of guns may not indicate anything. But consider the fact that there are 89 guns for 100 Americans. This means that there is almost one gun every American citizen including new born babies! This fact will help us understand why gun crime statistics show such a pathetic picture.
2) The second item of gun crime statistics that I am going to share will make the situation even more horrifying. Gun control opponents have been arguing that owning guns will make their homes safer. But gun crime statistics tell a different story. In those regions that have a high rate of gun ownership, the number of children becoming victims of gun violence is also high.
3) By way of corroborating the above facts, another item of gun crime statistics says that if there is a gun in a house, there is a high risk of women and children living in the house getting killed by guns.
4) The other side of children becoming victims of gun crime is also presented by gun crime statistics. A study has come out with a shocking finding that about 39 percent of children of gun owning parents know where their parents keep the guns. This points to the danger of guns falling into the hands of children, leading to the inappropriate use of guns by the children.
5) The consequences of the possibilities discussed above are revealed by gun crime statistics that when gun death is expressed as a ratio of the population of a country, the United States ranks below South Africa.
I get disturbed whenever I read the gun death statistics. In general, statistics will make dull reading. After all, it is boring to go through the figures and understand them. But some kinds of statistics like gun crime statistics should be read by all even if it needs some effort to do that. The picture presented by gun death statistics will support the case for a strong gun control law.
Let us look at some of these gun death statistics. A study made on homicides in the United States shows that in 60 percent of the cases, the murders were committed by using guns. In fact, whenever we hear about a murder, before we know the details, we are likely to think that the murder was committed using a gun! Such is the association of gun with death. You may be shocked to know that every year 30,000 people are shot dead in the US. Gun control facts like this are only to be expected given the state of high gun ownership in our country.
You can find a lot more gun death statistics if you go through gun control articles. But none of these figures seem to have any effect on organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) who have made it a point to blindly oppose any gun control measure. The only way these people respond to gun death statistics is by claiming that in a democracy, there should be no control on guns. What they fail to understand is that democracy means rule of law and to ensure that the rule of law is properly implemented, tyranny has to be curbed. Tyranny resulting from guns should also be controlled in the interest of democracy.
The intransigence displayed by the NRA in spite of the grim realities presented by gun death statistics makes one perceive this body not as any kind of club but only as a paid lobby. This perception is confirmed by the policy of the NRA to not accept any compromise. It will not consider the gun control pros and cons and will not even look at the gun death statistics.
Sometimes, I wonder what the purpose of a gun control debate is. This is not like an academic debate that takes place either as a contest or as a form of entertainment. Gun control debate takes place at various levels making a threadbare analysis of gun control pros and cons with the aim of bringing out all the relevant facts and arguments into the public arena.
Unfortunately, the gun control debate has been going on for too long in our country. It has not thrown up any new issues. Gun control facts may need updating with new gun death statistics figures being compiled everyday. I have come across two updated gun crime statistics. One is that a high percentage of homicide crimes (about 60 percent ) are caused by the use of guns. The second one is the finding that strict gun control measures will bring down not only the number of murders but also the number of suicides. I am not sure whether the gun control debate will be enriched by this information since this is only a confirmation of the trend being witnessed over the past few decades.
But what is the response of the anti gun control lobby to these points brought out in the gun control debate? Either it should accept these facts or counter them, if it can. But opponents of gun control will do neither. They will only raise issues that have no bearing on the gun control facts. These people use frivolous arguments like the desirability of restricting the right to own guns that has been given to us by the 2nd amendment. Perhaps these people are not aware that about 99 percent of this act was prepared by people, though eminent and well versed in various fields, lacked a formal legal education. For its part, the National Rifles Association (NRA) has been threatening legislators that they would be defeated in the primaries and thus would not get a chance to be reelected if they supported gun control measures.
I welcome gun control articles. They make their own contribution to the cause of gun control. Obviously a gun control article may support or oppose making gun control stronger. But either way, they will be making a valuable contribution to the gun control debate. The only thing I will expect from good gun control articles is that they should state gun control facts truthfully.
There are a number of studies resulting in gun crime statistics. The picture revealed by these figures will not but disturb anyone who values human life. Gun control articles will be doing a great service to the cause of gun control if they present gun death statistics appropriately, even if the articles are written opposing legislation putting curbs on owning and using guns.
People should be aware of gun control pros and cons so that they can formulate their opinions objectively. Otherwise they may be carried away by sentimental arguments that depict owning guns as a right conferred on us by the 2nd amendment. We have organizations like the National Rifles Association (NRA) that describe themselves as an association of sports people obscuring the fact that they are highly paid lobbies campaigning against any restrictions on guns. We have several pro NRA legislators who scuttle the efforts of institutions like the National Institute of health even studying gun violence. Gun control articles can probe the question whether the NRA is a political organization or a body of lobbyists. By presenting gun death statistics objectively, gun control articles will serve as a forum to counter propaganda with truth.
Gun control articles should highlight facts relating to the issue of gun death. For example, they can enlighten the readers of the fact that guns are used not only for murders but also for suicides. The message that gun control laws can prevent our near and dear ones from resorting to suicide on some emotional moment by putting restrictions on the availability of guns to anyone and everyone can be effectively conveyed by well written gun control articles.
Gun control facts are useful in assessing the situation arising out of the present system of uncontrolled gun ownership. Any objective person will be interested in looking at the gun control pros and cons before making up his mind on the controversial issue of gun control. Gun control facts facilitate an dispassionate understanding of the issue without being carried away by rhetorical claims that since the right to own a gun is derived from the 2nd amendment, such a right cannot be taken away by law.
Gun control facts include public information about the effectiveness or otherwise of strong gun control measures implemented in other countries and gun death statistics showing how gun death has a strong correlation with gun ownership. For example, the fact that Australia was able to bring down gun deaths by 60 percent is a strong pointer to the power of legislation in curbing violence. If we read this information along with the data provided by gun control facts that regions that have more privately owned guns have consistently reported a larger number of children being killed, we can understand that gun control will have a positive impact and that failure to control gun ownership can only increase the incidence of gun death.
Unfortunately, gun crime statistics do not seem to move some people. There are groups like the National Rifles Association (NRA) that are bent upon scuttling any move towards even a moderate gun control law. It does not matter to them if 30,000 people in America become the victims of gun violence every year. Nor will these groups be concerned about the yearly loss suffered by the US economy to the tune of $3.70 billion. Undeterred by all these negative effects revealed by gun control facts, the NRA is adamant on its anti gun control stand. Such obstinacy in the face of damning gun control facts makes one justifiably question the claim of NRA to be a political organization and deem it to be rather a grouping of lobbyists.
In the wake of the massacre at Newtown, much of the gun control debate has focused on stricter regulations on military assault rifles. However, an examination of gun control facts in America clearly shows that new regulations must limit the spread of handguns as well.
Government gun control facts show that two thirds of all US murders committed with a gun, the homicide is accomplished using a HANDGUN. Apparently, military style weapons of mass destruction are the preferred tools for those intent on killing many people quickly. The AVERAGE murder however is the result of shooting someone with a pistol.
In Great Britain there are about 550 homicides per year (2011). In the USA there were 12,664 murders of which 8583 were from hand guns.
These gun crime statistics are astonishing. That means that in America there are TWENTY THREE people killed for every ONE in England, Ireland, Wales and Scotland combined!
Gun control articles also show that there is a very real correlation between gun deaths and the number of households with guns. In the six states with the highest rates of gun ownership, an average of 53 percent of households owned firearms; in the four states with the lowest rates of gun ownership, an average of 13 percent of households contained firearms. From 1988 to 1997, the high gun states had more than 21,000 individuals who were homicide victims, compared with 7,300 in the low gun states. If you lived in a high gun state you were 4.2 times more likely to die in a gun related homicide than those who in the low gun states.
Gun death statistics are REAL. Gun control facts tell us the truth about gun crime.
As Americans look to create more effective gun control laws we must ensure that gun control facts become well known. Statistics to speak to us. Gun laws that don’t limit handguns will not limit gun deaths.
Gun control articles focus on the dangers resulting from misuse of guns by people who own guns. Every gun control article uses several research facts to support the demand that gun control laws should be made more stringent. Some of the research facts used by gun control articles are:
1) About 60 percent of homicides that occur in the United States result from the use of guns. This fact strongly suggests that killers find guns to be a convenient weapon to use on the victims.
2) There are gun crime statistics showing the number of deaths caused by guns for a population of 10,000. When these figures are compared for different countries, the US fares worse than South Africa. That is to say, proportionately more gun deaths take place in the US than in South Africa. Gun death statistics are a strong basis for supporting stringent legislation on gun control.
3) Another disturbing fact cited by gun control articles is that about 40 percent of the kids know where their gun owning parents keep the guns in their houses. So, they can get ready access to the guns. This should cause some worry to anyone.
4) One more fact involving children is that in areas where gun ownership is high, the incidence of gun death is also high. Gun control articles point out that this correlation is too strong and too damning to be ignored or taken lightly.
5) If you think that guns can cause only deaths and injuries, you are wrong. Guns can play havoc with the Economy as well. A gun control essay quotes research studies to show that there is an economic loss associated with guns too. And the loss estimated is huge standing at $3.7 billion per annum. This should make even the people managing the treasury to come out in support of strong gun control measures!
Gun control articles are thus able to build a strong case for tightening the laws, using research facts that cant be disputed by anyone.